Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Re: Something to think about
Author: Fredrik Lundh Posted: 12/16/1998; 6:52:27 AM Topic: DaveNet comments Msg #: 1335 (In response to 1331) Prev/Next: 1334 / 1336
>> Maybe they proved nothing because Clinton obstructed justice? <<You mean that having consentual sex with one person *proves* that he harrassed or abused another person?
I find that a bit... absurd.
Would a competent judge throw out the harrassment case *only* based on an obviously misleading answer ("under these exact and formal definitions, the answer is, no" -- call that a lie if you prefer)?
I haven't followed that case closely, but there must have been more behind the judge's decision?
>> Do you see the connection? <<
Not yet /F
There are responses to this message:
- Re: Something to think about, Dave Winer, 12/16/1998; 7:05:50 AM
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:46:39 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.