Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Re: What's the deal with Third Voice?
Author: Paul Snively Posted: 9/27/1999; 8:59:47 PM Topic: Windows apps on Linux: the real reason Msg #: 11513 (In response to 11496) Prev/Next: 11512 / 11514
Dave Winer wrote:
On my website, as in my home, I am not an equal with every jerk who wants to complain about his or her miserable life.
I then replied:
I certainly think this is fair. The problem is what happens once your content leaves your server.
Dave then wrote:
Let's not repeat the old arguments. I added something new. Respond to it, or not. But let's not loop around. Thanks for listening.
Well, two things: first, I'm not sure I understand--seriously--what aspect of what I quoted before was new. You've always had a good point about your content on your server. The issue has always been what happens between server and browser. I've written quite a lot about SSL/TLS on the wire and digital certificate authentication--which, so far, no one has responded to.
I'll be happy to reiterate the TLS/digital certificate ideas, but I think I've found a better one: see <http://www.waterken.com> and follow the link to the "Beach Sex" demo. It's a great exposition of the ideas behind capability-based security and, importantly from an application point of view, Electronic Rights Transfer.
My final point--and after this I promise I will shut up on the subject--is that instead of complaining about people taking advantage of the lack of security between server and browser, let's implement solutions to the problem. I have every reason to believe that implementing capability-based security and Electronic Rights Transfer in Frontier would be trivial.
Thanks for the space, Paul
There are responses to this message:
- Re: What's the deal with Third Voice?, Wesley Felter, 9/28/1999; 9:41:11 PM
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:52:50 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.