Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Re: Mozilla is not a browser
Author: Nick Sweeney Posted: 4/12/2000; 12:05:29 PM Topic: Mozilla is not a browser Msg #: 16131 (In response to 16104) Prev/Next: 16130 / 16132
Instead of thinking of Mozilla as an application like a web browser, think of it as a set of tools that lets you build lots of different web-enabled applications. You can use Mozilla to build web applications that take advantage of the web-centric nature of Mozilla.
Or you can use Mozilla to build a web browser.
Pardon the tone of cynicism, but my biggest misgiving with the Mozilla project, as it has now become, is the complaint cited by Joel elsewhere: that with the complete rewrite, and no firm project outline, it's become the simultaneous benificiary and victim of developer bloat.
You can see it from two perspectives: Mozilla is the classic "stone soup" project, where starting from precious little -- a codebase which had to be more or less dumped anyway -- it's attracted a lot of talent and creative thought. On the other hand, after two years of development, I still don't have a reliable, fast, standards-compliant graphical browser on my Linux box, and I don't see one coming from any direction. And nothing stifles development as much as an unstable platform.
Mozilla is turning into the web's equivalent of Emacs; but it's important to use the codebase, and in particular the Gecko renderer, to come up with something that does the job of vi. An "Application Virtual Machine" has lots of advantages, but as anyone who's used a 100% Java browser can attest, cross-platform consistency has its costs.
There are responses to this message:
- Re: Mozilla is not a browser, Dave Winer, 4/12/2000; 3:45:53 PM
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:54:44 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.