Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Re: TThoughts on ESR and Perl
Author: Dave Winer Posted: 8/26/1999; 12:48:46 PM Topic: Opening Up Linux Journal and O'Reilly Msg #: 9983 (In response to 9981) Prev/Next: 9982 / 9984
Now, Larry Wall has a point. Almost nobody knows the rules to English, but we all speak it just fine. Perl is popular, so many people must like irregular, non-orthogonal programming languages.Thanks for the clarification Eric, and I want to also disclaim that when we're debating this way I am merely expressing my own opinion and not speaking for UserLand.
Now I disagree with the quoted statement above. I think we do not communicate well with English, most of the time. I had never considered the possibility that it's due to the lack of understandable rules in the language, but I want to give this some thought.
About ESR and me, the first time I heard of him was the Cathedral piece he wrote. I felt targeted by it, and reduced to a simple evil, and I work hard and I care about quality, and I don't like to be side-swiped by someone who's just another Microsoft basher.
Further, I saw all kinds of people who I knew to be software idiots repeating his words as if they had found some precious wisdom. This is the pattern of the software biz. It makes me want to barf. I always think the trained parrots are a sign of where not to go. If they say Open Source Open Source Open Source I say Head for the Hills, Head for the Hills, etc, until it's safe to come down and resume *our* mission, which is to enable the web as a publishing medium, which is a far broader mission than promoting anything having to do with releasing source code for operating systems, web servers and script interpreters.
There are responses to this message:
- Re: Thoughts on ESR and Perl, Eric Kidd, 8/26/1999; 1:11:35 PM
- Re: Thoughts on ESR and Perl, Fredrik Lundh, 8/27/1999; 2:38:05 AM
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:52:08 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.