Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Re: C# papers
Author: Eric Kidd Posted: 6/26/2000; 5:50:11 PM Topic: C# papers Msg #: 18129 (In response to 18101) Prev/Next: 18128 / 18130
I don't understand the point of C# at all. I was hoping, when I first saw reports of this, that C|Net's reporter had conflated new features of Visual Studio 7 with the old COOL rumors, and that the other reports were just cribbing off of C|Net. Unfortunately, that's not true.C# has a number of virtues (and some random oddities). To make a long story short, it's a slightly tweaked relative of Java, and it claims to play nicely with existing C code. It uses native compilation, of course.
The manual doesn't mention SOAP or XML at all (although it talks about COM quite a bit). So I'm guessing the XML support must live in a standard library somewhere.
So, if:
- Your application runs on Windows,
- You need to work with COM,
- and you'd like something vaguely like Java, but compiled...
...C# might be a good idea. You could probably modify an existing C/C++ compiler to support C# (using the same techniques Cygnus used to implement GCJ), and use the Boehm GC to get garbage collection running.
If Microsoft pushes hard enough, we'll probably see C# everywhere. Expect amazing amounts of hype, most of which will be even more misleading than Sun's. ;-)
Cheers,
Eric
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:55:30 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.