Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Re: Mozilla is not a browser
Author: Steven Vore Posted: 4/16/2000; 1:43:44 PM Topic: Mozilla is not a browser Msg #: 16302 (In response to 16262) Prev/Next: 16301 / 16303
if they decide that some of the critical functions of the UI require HTML renderingAh, I see where you're at. I was thinking more about the way that "explorer" changed once IE was "integrated", that sort of thing. The User Experience changed without (imho) any user benefit. I can deal with, though, your example of the help engine changing it's data file format and display engine. I guess I'll have to ponder what the differences are to me a little more [grin].
As for replacable, I've been in the software support business for almost eight years now and can certianly understand apprehension on the developers & supporters part. But it seems like we've already got a worse mess with other components - how many different apps drop their own copy of mfc42.dll on the system without checking for a newer version? So somewhere in the system control panel or somesuch there's a field that shows the currently installed version of html_renderer.dll (or whatever) that can easily be checked. Perhaps the os even keeps a backup copy and can swap whatever's there with it's own in case a problem is suspected.
I know, I'm being optimistic. Why should MS, or any company, do a little extra work that would allow customers to use another company's product in conjuncion with their own?
More thought obviously needed. But not during the weekend :)
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:54:49 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.