Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Okay, then why not go ahead and use GPLed code?
Author: David Adams Posted: 8/25/2000; 1:28:57 PM Topic: A softer GPL? Msg #: 20256 (In response to 20250) Prev/Next: 20255 / 20257
This renders both the GPL and the "wacky" license you propose above unenforceable as well as unethical.Well, I feel you tried to change the topic by bringing up the enforcability of the GPL rather than the ethics of the DWPL, but it's clear you think that Dave's Wacky Public License is unethical as well. That's fine. I don't agree with you, but you've made your position clear.
My next question is this: if you think the GPL is unenforceable, then why don't you go ahead and use whatever GPLed code you want! Certainly you could make a killing by taking a mature product that isn't being developed much anymore and adding some amazing new features to it. Just release the binary, wait for the FSF to sue you, and you'll be able to invalidate the GPL in court. Then we won't have to argue anymore!
-dave
There are responses to this message:
- Test case, Brett Glass, 8/25/2000; 2:36:01 PM
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:56:17 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.