Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.

Re: Apple vs Microsoft re Quicktime

Author:Brian Wilder
Posted:11/11/1998; 2:05:25 PM
Topic:First message
Msg #:308 (In response to 301)
Prev/Next:307 / 309

Personally, I am surprised that Apple did not make the Quicktime player an ActiveX control. That decision sounds like laziness combined with stupidity to me. (Look at Macromedia's Shockwave - available as ActiveX control, plug-in, even Java applet - if you want to get a rough idea of potential comparative program size and performance.)

One useful data point is a comparison of Windows Media Player with the Quicktime Player, running a quicktime video. Use Wintop (the Msft Kernal powertoy) to compare the processor cycles consumed. Quicktime is a pig.

Another "fact" that should not be overlooked is that file associations on Windows are a mess, with installation programs "stealing" associations from one another without consulting the user, and that is an architectural problem created (and maintained?) by Microsoft.




This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:45:49 PM.

© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.