Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Re: Instant Messaging
Author: Wesley Felter Posted: 8/1/1999; 4:02:53 PM Topic: Today's scriptingNews Outline Msg #: 8987 (In response to 8969) Prev/Next: 8986 / 8988
This raises an interesting question: Assuming that we can get DNS straightened out, why not just use DNS as the instant messaging directory protocol? We already have dynamic DNS. You would still need a client-to-client protocol, but at least you'd have a distributed directory (unlike the current situation where there are a few huge directory servers). The business model for DNS is simple: If you want to be in the DNS, you can either run a server or pay someone to do it.
Another thought: We already have standard protocols for audio- and video-conferencing, which are much more complicated than IM. Yet there are probabably more people using IM today than conferencing.
There are responses to this message:
- Re: Instant Messaging, Dave Winer, 8/1/1999; 4:21:23 PM
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:51:39 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.