Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Re: Windows apps on Linux: the real reason
Author: Nick Sweeney Posted: 9/24/1999; 9:20:25 AM Topic: Windows apps on Linux: the real reason Msg #: 11431 (In response to 11429) Prev/Next: 11430 / 11432
There's a technical factor here, though: Microsoft have the difficulty of addressing the separation of the GUI from the kernel in Unices. Their previous forays into UNIX environments suggest that alternative solutions are pretty messy: the Solaris version of IE4, for instance, installs a huge directory of hacked-up DLLs. Though I've not used it, reports on its release suggested that it wasn't worth the effort.
If Microsoft are looking for portability, then they're likely to have to follow the path of Corel in embracing the WINE libraries, or produce something similar. Which brings up various Open Source licensing issues. In effect, the question isn't necessarily whether MS should develop for Linux, but rather, whether it can. Which perhaps accounts for the latest push towards distributed process-handling.
There are responses to this message:
- Re: Windows apps on Linux: the real reason, Dave Winer, 9/24/1999; 9:30:27 AM
- Re: Windows apps on Linux: the real reason, David Valentine, 9/24/1999; 1:42:49 PM
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:52:48 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.