Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.

Re: "Open" vs. "Closed"

Author:Matthew R. Wilson
Posted:5/10/2000; 12:12:28 PM
Topic:"Open" vs. "Closed"
Msg #:17169 (In response to 17161)
Prev/Next:17168 / 17170

Eventually...I'll post another message back here when it is in a quasi-releasable state.

I do have a question about terminology. the "XML-RPC interface for Manila" defines what a CMS needs to include to be "Pike Compatable" and "Manila Compatable." What about CMSs that only implement a subset of those methods that make sense for the particular CMS? Could my CMS be labelled as "Pike Enabled" since it doesn't meet the Pike Compatable requirements, yet still uses Pike? It doesn't really matter, but it could be an interesting question...

There are responses to this message:

This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:55:09 PM.

© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.