Archive of UserLand's first discussion group, started October 5, 1998.
Re: Why Apple compare Apache on OS X with IIS on NT
Author: Chris Hanson Posted: 3/19/1999; 7:09:12 AM Topic: Why Apple compare Apache on OS X with IIS on NT Msg #: 4282 (In response to 4276) Prev/Next: 4281 / 4283
What does Apple need to do to make you feel that your products are welcome on Mac OS X Server?Macintosh APIs will be there with Mac OS X, in a modernized form. Current Macintosh applications cannot be run natively on a preemptively-multitasked memory-protected operating system without some porting (or a complete MacOS 8.x virtual machine), simply because of the way the Toolbox is structured. Carbon seems like a great value proposition.
As a developer, while Apple's silence on features and a lack of developer releases has annoyed me, I understand and accept their reasons and am willing to forgive them now that I can order it. And they never made me feel my applications weren't welcome.
And as an owner of a pair of NeXTstations, I can say that the Mac OS X Server development environment has me realy excited. I look forward to being able to get paid to do work in it.
There are responses to this message:
- Re: Why Apple compare Apache on OS X with IIS on NT, Dave Winer, 3/19/1999; 7:13:25 AM
- Re: Why Apple compare Apache on OS X with IIS on NT, Chuck Shotton, 3/19/1999; 11:48:23 AM
This page was archived on 6/13/2001; 4:48:53 PM.
© Copyright 1998-2001 UserLand Software, Inc.